Recently, I submitted a manuscript with a collaborator to a certain Elsevier journal. After the manuscript was registered by the system, the editor invited was still displayed. The status was still displayed one month later, so we immediately sent an email to the editing assistant through the EM system, and requested 3 The editors in the field deal with the manuscript, and the manuscript does not show an under review until two months later.
Out of curiosity, I went to the journal's homepage to check the composition of the journal's editorial board. There were actually hundreds of academic editors. Why wasn't anyone willing to accept the manuscript?
Before answering this question, you should first answer why the editorial department likes to recruit hundreds or even thousands of academic editors?
Internationalized journals require academic editors to be geographically distributed. Not all editors can come from one country.
For journals with a large number of submissions, if there are only a dozen or so academic editors, and each person handles hundreds of manuscripts per year, this is a burden on academic editors, and publishers must pay these editors.
It is understood that one periodical pays all academic editors about $ 40,000 per year. Then, taking Elsevier as an example, 3000 journals will pay about $ 120 million in academic editing costs. This is a problem that publishers have to face. .
If the number of academic editors is increased, most editors only need to process 20 to 40 manuscripts per year. This only requires paying a token subsidy to the editor and individual core editors each year. This will save the publisher tens of millions of dollars in expenses. .
In addition, by attracting more academic editors, journals can also have more resources for authors and readers in the field. Most journal editors will also actively promote these journals. These editors will also become regular authors and reviewers for the journal. Other related journals are active and strengthen the marketing of journals to a certain extent.
So, are researchers keen to be academic editors of SCI journals?
Journal articles are an effective carrier of scientific research results, a by-product of scientific research, and an effective way to declare intellectual property rights.
However, the manuscript processing efficiency of different journals is too different. If you can be an academic editor or even a well-known editorial board member in some recognized mainstream journals or journals with high impact factors, it is a matter of face.
It can be said that it has achieved its promotion from "athlete" to concurrently "referee".
In fact, as a periodical academic editor, you must follow the academic frontiers in your field in real time, and grasp who is doing what research in this field.
In addition, they also need to have a large database of reviewers in order to invite the appropriate reviewers for the assigned manuscripts, instead of passively choosing in the journal manuscript processing system.
Being an academic editor means responsibility, processing the author's submissions in real time, carefully reviewing the manuscript before submitting it for review, and judging whether the manuscript is worth submitting. If you encounter a manuscript that you are not sure of, you can also discuss it with other editors.
Of course, if you want to reject the manuscript, try to reply within two days, so as not to affect the follow-up work of the researcher.
Once you become a journal editor, you must adhere to the principles, and you must not lower the admission standards at will, otherwise you will eventually lead the journal into a "dead end."
Some researchers in some countries prefer to cooperate with journal editors to deliver the journal, and this situation should be avoided. For example, Zhang San is the editor of Periodical A, and Li Si will find it easier to accept and submit papers in cooperation with Zhang San.
From an academic perspective, anyone can cooperate with other relevant researchers to deliver any journal, but it is still necessary to avoid suspicion.
Of course, it is not that the name of the academic editor of the journal A will not be rejected by the journal A, because other editors under the journal A will decide to accept according to their own criteria.
Most ordinary academic editors basically have the experience of rejecting manuscripts. This is the independent supervision and restriction of journal academic editors.
The editors are more important when there are fewer academic editors of journals. There are too many journal editors. Some academic editors process less than 10 manuscripts each year or even one, so the role of such editors is unnecessary.
The role of academic editor has its place as a publishing house, editorial department, and researcher.
The issue of quantity mainly depends on the overall thinking of the editorial department and publishing house. Whether it can become an academic editor of a well-known journal depends on many factors. Except for core editors of open access journals, low-level editors can apply for self-recommendation.
For traditional periodicals, a nomination system is basically implemented, mainly based on the nomination of editor-in-chief or the recommendation of senior academic editors of journals. Active, serious and responsible reviewers of reviewers will be actively promoted to academic editors by some journals.
Researchers have made a series of research results around a main line in a certain field. In this case, they will also be invited by the editorial department to become academic editors.
However, no matter how you become an academic editor, you must not forget your original intention, adhere to academic standards, and be responsible for the journal. Otherwise, manuscripts that are not processed in accordance with the standard process will eventually lead to the reputation of the journal being discarded by readers, authors, and reviewers. .
Disclaimer: This website is a non-profit website. Most of the information comes from the recommendations of netizens. If the author or other copyright owner believes your rights are violated, please let us know and we will remove them within 24 hours.