Again punished! Still familiar taste ...
In the past few days, bad news came from the newspaper and magazine circles. Two prefecture-level newspapers punished several responsible persons for mistakes in some of the most frequently used words. Alas, as a member of the newspapers and periodicals, I really feel sad, helpless, panic, heart failure ...
The unit name, we still have the old rules, not to mention. Let's talk about what went wrong, I hope that colleagues will pay more attention to this word in the future. Let me first talk about a mistake that the editor personally changed: don't remember the original intention and keep the mission in mind. In front of the editor, several editors proofread the editor-in-chief, and did not see any problems. On the day the editor was on duty, he looked at the table while he was proofing, and God, political mistake! !! !! Everyone came around, "Oh, there is a comma in the middle?" Someone asked skeptically ... quiet, quiet ... "Ah, don't forget your heart and remember your mission!"
After the change, everyone was grateful and joked: It is estimated that other media will make such a mistake.
As soon as the words came down, the next day, we received news from a local newspaper in China. This word was also wrong. After deducting more than N dollars, the party was asked to reflect for a month.
Six days ago, the term of another prefecture-level newspaper in China was wrong, but different from the previous one: not forgetting the original intention and forgetting the mission. Well, the same punishment, the same remorse, the same reflection again.
The Chinese editor's proofreading network will not be posted, so as not to be guessed by which one, it will increase the pressure on the editor and proofreader.
It ’s not in this field, maybe editors are incompetent, proofreading is blind, editor-in-chief **, in fact, Chinese editor proofreading network from the 20 years of professional feeling: sometimes it is really impossible! However, there is no reason to forgive yourself.
Let's take a look at several articles published in previous years.
Take a look at the picture above. If this error happened recently when you were reading the manuscript, is it going to be a cold sweat! So familiar! Read it every day! Everywhere! Edited it! Proofread stared! Editor-in-chief! Still found wrong before proofing! !!
This is not the picture I drew. One is the mistake of the photo agency, and the other is the mistake of academic journals, but all are errors of previous years. You can still open this page when you go online.
Don't Believe Editing or Not Believing in Ghosts!
Readers are even more unbelievable-editing is too irresponsible!
Leaders did not believe in killing-deliberately disrupted, removed and investigated!
The more familiar it seems, the easier it is to make mistakes. I think many editors and proofreaders may feel the same.
When an average person understands a sentence or a long phrase, the information of each word is input into the brain. Instead of processing each information word by word, it integrates all the information to get the desired information.
For simple everyday learning or when we are watching a paragraph that is more familiar and more "taken for granted", we may "know" the message it conveys through the impression of a few words. At this time, we often ignore the typos in it. .
Such as the above paragraph. For another example, once you see "Society" and "Yizhu" linked together, you can take it for granted that the familiar phrase is right. If there is a "feature" in front or "* 心 ** 观" followed, it is easier Slip past the error. Another example is the two errors mentioned at the beginning of the article.
What is going on? It is said that "Gestalt psychology" can be explained, it is defined as follows: if there is an "empirical phenomenon", each part is implicated in other parts, and each part has characteristics because it has a relationship with other parts, This phenomenon is called a gestalt. A sentence can be a gestalt, and a word can also be a gestalt. For example, familiar concepts and names (such as the examples above), names and titles of officials (such as the "may" few mayors), familiar years, and familiar numbers.
Is there a way to eliminate it? Maybe it can be eliminated from your hands, but you cannot guarantee that everyone (including software) can eliminate it! Otherwise, there won't be these errors above!
Saying these is also the feeling after the end of the intense work-too many hidden dangers (specific examples are inconvenient to say publicly)-although the process is perfect. I think that the editors and proofreaders of the news media have not experienced a few internal accidents that "shocked a cold sweat".
Experience is also a gain! Not much to say, excerpt a paragraph of our Chinese editor proofreading network has been calling for since the establishment in 2000: editors start with proofreading, proofreading learn from editors.
The so-called "editing starts with proofreading, and proofreading learns from editors" actually refers to the relationship between editing and proofreading, which can be summarized in a few words: same source, shunt, cooperation, co-homing. The so-called homologation, that is, proofreading, occurs simultaneously with editing. Diversion means that editing and proofreading have moved towards division of labor as publishing production gradually takes shape. The proofreading work is separated from the editing work, but the basic attribute of proofreading work as an important part of the editing work has not changed. It is a continuation of the editing work, a checkpoint for the quality of the publication text, and eliminates errors before publication. This also ensures the dissemination and accumulated value of publications.
Part of the proofreading work is included in the editing, and proofreading is the continuation of editing. A good editor should be able to take on the proofreading duties in the work. During the editing process, he will naturally correct the errors in the manuscript at any time. In addition to editing the manuscript, he must also resolve errors in viewpoints, grammar, rhetoric, logic, and obvious common sense in the manuscript. Proofreading should have unique sensitivity and high discrimination of right and wrong typos, and be good at finding out the hidden errors between the lines. In the proofreading process, each character, word, and punctuation mark is used as the reading unit, and every effort is made to discover the slight errors. In the process of implementing such characters, it often enters a state of concentration and careful consideration. This is also the basic requirement for editors.
Disclaimer: This website is a non-profit website. Most of the information comes from the recommendations of netizens. If the author or other copyright owner believes your rights are violated, please let us know and we will remove them within 24 hours.